Doctor work - Affordable Writing Service - Affordable Essay (Dissertation) Writing Services

Principles of
Distributed Computing
Promotion Dissertation Award

The principles of the distributed computing doctoral dissertation award were created in 2012 to confirm and promote outstanding research from doctoral students (Ph.D.) to the principles of the distributed computer.

Award-winning dissertations

Authorization

.
• In order to question for the award in the year X, a nominated dissertation must have been successful in the period January 1, x-2 to 31 December, x 1.
• If the consultant is the dissertation in the core committee of the year X (see below), it can not be nominated in year X. In this case, the authorization period extends by one year, ie a dissertation, ie a dissertation that is successfully defended between January 1, X-3 to 31 December, X-2 is eligible if And only if it is not in a .
.
• The core committee of the year X is disjoint of those of the years X-1 and X-2. Each dissertation is thus used exactly twice .
• The dissertation must be in English: either originally written in English or translated.
• The main theme of the dissertation must be on the principles of the distributed computer. (For a possible indication of what it means to this term, see z. For example, the call for papers of disc and podc.)

Nomination and submission

A one-sided nomination letter must be submitted by the thesis advisor. The nomination should highlight the contributions of the dissertation and justify why the dissertation of the award is worthy.

Submission checklist

Nomination must include the following:

1. contact details (membership and e-mail addresses) of the consultant and the doctoral student.
2. A Formal Document of the Student Department / Institute / Organization checks the date on which the dissertation has been successfully defended (a scanned version is acceptable for submission, but the original document may be required at a later date of evaluation). If not specified with the document, the period the student has been logged in in the promotion program.
3. a one-sided justification letter.
4. The following four working lists (CO), which were assigned by the candidate:
   1. Publications containing material from work detailed, from which material has been included, from which part of the work and parts that are not included in the work.
   2. Publications cited in the work, however, do not contain any material that also appears in the work.
   3. papers currently reviewed, including the journal input of previously published work containing material from work, in detail, from which material has been included, from which material part of the work and parts that are not are included in the work.
   4. These parts of the work that are not included in the other lists.
5. A list of awards that the student for the dissertation and / or publications received work.
6. a copy of the dissertation in electronic form (preferably in pdf).
7. a separate copy of the summary in electronic form (either as PDF or plain text).

Award Committee and Review Process

The Committee consists of four core members and a series of ad hoc members selected as described below. The review process consists of two stages:

The first selection phase executed by the core elements is based on the nomination letters and publishing lists. At the end of this phase, a short list of the dissertations drawn in the second round is compiled.

Based on the brief list, the four core members identify experts for the topics of the dissertations and invite you to be additional (ad hoc members of the committee.The committee should be sufficiently many members so that each dissertation of three members can be reviewed without requiring a member to review more than two dissertations.

For an award year x, the four core members are the following:

• The PC Chair for Disc in the year X-9.
• The PC Chair for PODC in the year X-9.
• the PC Chair for Disc in the year X-1.
• The PC Chair for PODC in the year X-1.

The committee chair changes between disc and PODC PC chairs of the year x-9.In particular when X is even, the chair is the disc PC chair of x-9, and when x is odd, is the chair The PODC PC Chair of X-9.

Members of the committees in the years X-1 and X-2 are not entitled to participate in the Committee on Year's Year's Year, a person should work on behalf of the missing disc / PODC PC chair.

Evaluation criteria

The nominated dissertations will be reviewed on technical depth and importance of research contributions in the area of ??the distributed computer, potential impact on theory and practice as well as quality of presentation / writing, including thoroughness of the description of the relatives work and understanding of algorithms, and evidence.

Tags: service, writing, affordable, work, doctor

Recent Posts:
Case Study Writing Services - Best Writing Services
Can you write my paper? - Best Writing Service
Cheap Assignment Leading Service - Excellent Essay Services
Case study writing service - Best Essay Service
Case Study Pendant - Top Writing Services